Total Inabilty

Ron Hossack has a clear article that presents his rejection of the TULIP of Calvin’s theology. The article is found here http://www.biblefragrances.com/studies/tulipHossack.html

I grew up a Presbyterian learning the Westminster confession at a young age. Many of the principles contained in the confession bothered me then and they bother me now. Calvin took Augustine theology as the basis for his own theology. He wrapped this theology in his contemporary understanding of Sovereignty. Arminious his student later defended Calvin’s theology but ran into a problem when confronted by those opposed to his teaching. They presented to him some strong Biblical arguments that seemed to undermined what Calvin had taught. Arminious then did a study and came up with a Biblical argument against Calvin. He formulated his argument in five statements. After his death a council was called to resolve the stark differences between Calvin and Arminious. Both men had died and neither were alive to argue for themselves. The council was politically stacked in Calvin’s favor. The Arminian support actually left the council and never defended their position because of the unfair rules imposed against them. The Council produced counter points to the Arminian position known today by the acronym TULIP. All but the last point of the TULIP present a Biblical concept prefaced by an adjective.

T - Total Inability;
U - Unconditional Election;
L - Limited Atonement;
I - Irresistible (efficacious) Grace; and
P - Perseverance of the Saints."

It is fascinating to me that the nouns in these phrases are Biblical while the adjectives are not. When you discover that truth the system begins to unravel. Taking liberally from the article sighted above I will demonstrate what I mean.

The Total Inability or as it is sometimes called the Total Depravity of man has as its basis the ideal that man cannot save himself. There is nothing in man that can appeal to God for his salvation. Man cannot produce any work, any devotion, any thought or activity that will earn his good standing before God. Even God’s law is not a means for salvation because man is not capable of keeping that law. This is an absolute Biblical truth. So man has an inability associated with his fallen, sinful state that can be traced back to the Garden of Eden and Adam coming under the influence of a spirit other then God’s. That is a spirit belonging to Satin that presented Adam with the lie that he could be like God, that he could discern what was good and what was evil. Only God can change the fallen state of man. That, as we know, is the Gospel, the good news found in the saving grace of God in Christ. It is only in God’s work of the Cross that man can be set free from his sin and the death that it produces. It is only in Christ’s death and resurrection that we can have new life, be born from above, in a way that brings us into eternal relationship with God. Again this is Biblical truth.

What is not true is that man is totally depraved or that man is totally incapable of responding to God. The T in tulip infers that man has no desire for God. Man will not seek God on his own in anyway unless God changes man first. We move from man’s inability to produce his salvation to a state in which he will not even seek his salvation, not from his own work, but even from God’s gracious gift. We move from man’s unwillingness to accept God’s offer of salvation to man’s total inability to even consider such an offer. This is so blatantly unscriptural that it boggles the mind.

Over and over Scripture describes mans unwillingness to receive God’s free gift. Never does it describe mans inability to receive that gift. The article sighted above does a good job of presenting this Biblical truth. I will give one example. (John 5:40), "You will not come to me, that you might have life." It is about ones willingness not about ones inability. It is about the fact that you will not come. It is not about the concept that you cannot come.

The Gospel is a free offering to man. The Gospel is a dialogue from the Word (logos) who became flesh, who dwelled among us and who presented compelling proof of who He was and what he was to bring to man. The Bible always presents man as persuadable and God as the presenter of truth, the pursuer of man.

The Calvin understanding of Total Inability distorts Scripture, including God’s call, the meaning of being reborn, mans response-ability to God, the fundamental meaning of faith and its source and much more. The more I know about this theology the more disturbed I become.